Comparing Clinical Examination and Radiological Imaging in Evaluation of Breast Lump

Dr. Swechchha Shubham, Dr. Gyanendra Mittal, Dr. Navneet Garg

Abstract: Background: Breast lumps are a common concern in general surgical practice. Clinical examination and radiological imaging (ultrasound for <40 years, mammography for >40 years) play key roles in evaluation. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of these modalities in breast lump evaluation. Methods: This prospective observational study included 50 patients with palpable breast lumps. All underwent clinical exam, imaging, FNAC, and HPE. Data was analyzed using SPSS v24. Ethical consideration: Ethical clearance for the proposed work was sought from the Institutional Ethical committee before start of the study. Results: Significant association was found between nipple discharge and malignancy (p < 0.05). Imaging showed higher diagnostic accuracy than clinical examination. The modified triple assessment was found effective in early diagnosis and planning. Conclusion: Radiological imaging significantly improves diagnostic precision and should supplement clinical examination in all cases.

Keywords: breast lump, clinical examination, radiological imaging, FNAC, triple assessment

How to Cite?: Dr. Swechchha Shubham, Dr. Gyanendra Mittal, Dr. Navneet Garg, "Comparing Clinical Examination and Radiological Imaging in Evaluation of Breast Lump", Volume 14 Issue 8, August 2025, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Pages: 261-262, https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=MR25803110353, DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/MR25803110353