Improper Approaches in EOT Submission ? Unstructured / Random Submissions Relating to Multiple Events

Suhair Nasib Hamza

Abstract: This article attempts to examine the critical issues that impede the accurate submission of contractor claims and Extensions of Time (EOTs). The analysis specifically focuses on the adverse consequences arising from contractors' practice of submitting multiple events in a single, indistinct submission without providing prior and adequate notification. This approach, frequently adopted by many contractors, poses significant risks that may adversely affect their entitlement and disrupt the overall progression and completion of projects. The research underscores that the disorganized submission of multiple events can introduce confusion, undermine the credibility of claims, and hinder project advancement. To substantiate its findings, the article will reference relevant studies and conduct a comprehensive analysis of a specific case study that illustrates common errors encountered in the claims process. This case study will elucidate the implications of such mistakes and their overall impact on submitted documentation. Furthermore, the article will identify the primary factors contributing to these challenges and propose constructive recommendations aimed at improving the efficacy of the claims process.

Keywords: EOT submission, construction delay, contract claims, windows Analysis, time impact analysis

How to Cite?: Suhair Nasib Hamza, "Improper Approaches in EOT Submission ? Unstructured / Random Submissions Relating to Multiple Events", Volume 14 Issue 7, July 2025, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Pages: 433-439, https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SR25630110536, DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/SR25630110536