Jurisdictional Challenges in Aircraft Security: Legal Gaps and Emerging threats in International Aviation
Abstract: Determining jurisdiction in the context of aircraft insecurity remains a persistent legal challenge, despite international efforts through conventions and national laws. This paper critically evaluates the efficacy of existing jurisdictional frameworks, highlighting the limitations of conventions such as Tokyo (1963), Hague (1970), and Beijing (2010), particularly in dealing with contemporary threats like cyber-attacks and drone warfare. It is evident that overlapping claims and the absence of a clear rule of priority among states continue to obstruct legal clarity and enforcement. In my view, a unified legal instrument with an established hierarchy of jurisdiction is urgently needed to address these issues effectively.
Keywords: jurisdiction, aircraft security, international aviation law, sovereignty, cyber threats
How to Cite?: Lionel Elaw Akime, "Jurisdictional Challenges in Aircraft Security: Legal Gaps and Emerging threats in International Aviation", Volume 14 Issue 6, June 2025, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Pages: 339-346, https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SR25529215851, DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/SR25529215851