Justice and Mercy: Constitutional Perspectives on the Leopold and Loeb Case and Its Legacy in Individualized Sentencing
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Call for Papers | Fully Refereed | Open Access | Double Blind Peer Reviewed

ISSN: 2319-7064


Downloads: 13 | Views: 258 | Weekly Hits: ⮙1 | Monthly Hits: ⮙4

Case Studies | Law | India | Volume 14 Issue 2, February 2025 | Popularity: 6.1 / 10


     

Justice and Mercy: Constitutional Perspectives on the Leopold and Loeb Case and Its Legacy in Individualized Sentencing

Araadhay Rai Bawa, Adhyayan Khurana


Abstract: This paper examines the landmark Leopold and Loeb case through the lens of constitutional law, focusing on the interplay between the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment and the Fourteenth Amendment's due process guarantees. Clarence Darrow?s defense strategy, emphasizing the moral and psychological dimensions of the defendants, challenged traditional views on capital punishment. The study employs a doctrinal and historical methodology, analyzing primary sources such as trial transcripts, judicial opinions, and constitutional texts to evaluate the case's enduring influence on individualized sentencing and the evolving interpretation of constitutional protections in capital cases.


Keywords: Leopold and Loeb case, constitutional law, capital punishment, Clarence Darrow, due process


Edition: Volume 14 Issue 2, February 2025


Pages: 148 - 151


DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.21275/SR25129220052


Please Disable the Pop-Up Blocker of Web Browser

Verification Code will appear in 2 Seconds ... Wait



Text copied to Clipboard!
Araadhay Rai Bawa, Adhyayan Khurana, "Justice and Mercy: Constitutional Perspectives on the Leopold and Loeb Case and Its Legacy in Individualized Sentencing", International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Volume 14 Issue 2, February 2025, pp. 148-151, https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SR25129220052, DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.21275/SR25129220052

Top