Prospective Comparative Study of Interrupted Single-Layer versus Double-Layer Bowel Anastomosis
Abstract: Background: Bowel anastomosis is essential for restoring gastrointestinal continuity, and optimal suturing technique remains debated. Purpose: This study compares interrupted single-layer and conventional double-layer bowel anastomosis regarding operative efficiency and postoperative outcomes. Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted on 70 patients undergoing bowel anastomosis, randomized into single-layer (n=35) and double-layer (n=35) groups. Outcomes included operative time, anastomotic leak, return of bowel function, and hospital stay. Results: Operative time was significantly shorter in the single-layer group (18.0 ± 2.39 minutes) compared to the double-layer group (28.57 ± 2.28 minutes; p 0.05). Conclusion: Interrupted single-layer anastomosis provides equivalent safety with improved efficiency and faster recovery, supporting its use in routine and resource-limited settings.
Keywords: anastomotic leak, bowel anastomosis, double-layer closure, gastrointestinal surgery, intestinal suturing techniques, operative time, postoperative outcomes, prospective study, randomized study, single-layer suturing, surgical outcomes
How to Cite?: Poojan B. Shah, Dinesh Prasad, Chintankumar Patel, "Prospective Comparative Study of Interrupted Single-Layer versus Double-Layer Bowel Anastomosis", Volume 15 Issue 4, April 2026, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Pages: 630-634, https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=MR26408090132, DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/MR26408090132