Rate the Article: Justice and Mercy: Constitutional Perspectives on the Leopold and Loeb Case and Its Legacy in Individualized Sentencing, IJSR, Call for Papers, Online Journal
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Call for Papers | Fully Refereed | Open Access | Double Blind Peer Reviewed

ISSN: 2319-7064

Downloads: 13 | Views: 259 | Weekly Hits: ⮙1 | Monthly Hits: ⮙4

Case Studies | Law | India | Volume 14 Issue 2, February 2025 | Rating: 6.1 / 10


Justice and Mercy: Constitutional Perspectives on the Leopold and Loeb Case and Its Legacy in Individualized Sentencing

Araadhay Rai Bawa, Adhyayan Khurana


Abstract: This paper examines the landmark Leopold and Loeb case through the lens of constitutional law, focusing on the interplay between the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment and the Fourteenth Amendment's due process guarantees. Clarence Darrow?s defense strategy, emphasizing the moral and psychological dimensions of the defendants, challenged traditional views on capital punishment. The study employs a doctrinal and historical methodology, analyzing primary sources such as trial transcripts, judicial opinions, and constitutional texts to evaluate the case's enduring influence on individualized sentencing and the evolving interpretation of constitutional protections in capital cases.


Keywords: Leopold and Loeb case, constitutional law, capital punishment, Clarence Darrow, due process


Edition: Volume 14 Issue 2, February 2025,


Pages: 148 - 151



Rate this Article


Select Rating (Lowest: 1, Highest: 10)

5

Your Comments (Only high quality comments will be accepted.)

Characters: 0

Your Full Name:


Your Valid Email Address:


Verification Code will appear in 2 Seconds ... Wait

Top