Downloads: 8
India | Medical Science | Volume 14 Issue 7, July 2025 | Pages: 1214 - 1215
Comparative Study of Lipid Profile in Vegetarian and Non-Vegetarian Individuals: Implications for Cardiovascular Disease Risk
Abstract: Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a leading cause of global mortality, with dietary patterns playing a significant role in modulating lipid profiles and associated risks. Objective: To compare the lipid profile parameters between vegetarian and non-vegetarian individuals and assess their implications for future CVD risk. Methods: A total of 100 healthy individuals aged 18?40 years were enrolled and categorized into two groups-vegetarians (n=50) and non-vegetarians (n=50). After 10?12 hours of fasting, blood samples were collected and analyzed using a fully automated biochemistry analyzer for lipid profile parameters: Total Cholesterol (TC), High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL), and Triglycerides (TG). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v26. Results: The non-vegetarian group showed significantly higher levels of LDL (p=0.003) and TC (p=0.009) compared to vegetarians. HDL levels were marginally higher in vegetarians, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.478). Differences in VLDL (p=0.056) and TG (p=0.055) approached significance. Conclusion: The vegetarian group exhibited a more favorable lipid profile, suggesting a potentially lower risk for future cardiovascular events. These findings highlight the positive influence of vegetarian diets on cardiovascular health.
Keywords: Lipid profile, vegetarian diet, non-vegetarian diet, cardiovascular disease, cholesterol, triglycerides
How to Cite?: Vivekgiri Goswami, "Comparative Study of Lipid Profile in Vegetarian and Non-Vegetarian Individuals: Implications for Cardiovascular Disease Risk", Volume 14 Issue 7, July 2025, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Pages: 1214-1215, https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SR25717115812, DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/SR25717115812
Received Comments
No approved comments available.