Downloads: 5
United States | Biology | Volume 14 Issue 2, February 2025 | Pages: 262 - 264
Deployment of Intrusive Advising Methods to Transform Student Retention and Success Outcomes in the STEM Pathway
Abstract: Intrusive advising is a type of student advising characterized as a highly interactive and proactive student-centered process. Intrusive advising, like traditional advising frameworks such as developmental and prescriptive advising, is essential for identifying and designing remediation approaches to ensure student success and retention. Intrusive advising involves deliberately administrating Tinto?s academic and social integration objectives. Data indicates that intrusive advising is an effective strategy for improving student undergraduate success and academic retention rates. Intrusive advising may also advance research training and career development goals. Most of the data on this topic focuses on the first two years of college. More data is needed to explore the impact of intrusive advising on the last two years of college to understand better how intrusive advising mediates persistence, graduation, and entry into graduate school, professional school, or the job market. Further, more targeted information is needed to explore how intrusive advising improves student progression and degree completion for science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) majors. The current article has significant implications for student advising policy and practice. Intrusive advising methods may be essential for minority-serving institutions with retention rates well below the national average.
Keywords: intrusive advising, retention, undergraduate research, proactive, academic achievement
How to Cite?: Lawrence O. Flowers, "Deployment of Intrusive Advising Methods to Transform Student Retention and Success Outcomes in the STEM Pathway", Volume 14 Issue 2, February 2025, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Pages: 262-264, https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=MS25204172917, DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/MS25204172917
Received Comments
No approved comments available.