Downloads: 123
Research Paper | Oncology Science | Volume 6 Issue 10, October 2017 | Pages: 1855 - 1858 | India
End to End (Double stapled) Versus End to Side (Triple Stapled) Colorectal Anastomosis Following Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
Abstract: Introduction Sphincter saving procedures for mid and low rectal cancers is made possible with the use of Double stapling (DS) technique. Most important complication is anastomotic leak, which depends on the technique of anastomosis apart from other factors. Our aim is to compare early outcomes between End-to-End (Double Stapled) and End-to-Side (Triple stapled) anastomosis following Anterior resection (AR). Methods All patients who underwent AR/LAR for rectal cancer during the period July 2014 to December 2016 were included. Following resection, patients were randomized to either End-to-End (EEA) or End-to-Side (ESA) anastomosis. Intra operative factors, and early postoperative outcomes were compared between two groups. P Value
Keywords: Anterior resection, Sphincter saving, Anastomotic leak, Doughnut
How to Cite?: Venkatarami Reddy Vutukuru, Sivarama Krishna Gavini, Chandramaliteeswaran C, Dr. Sarala Settipalli, "End to End (Double stapled) Versus End to Side (Triple Stapled) Colorectal Anastomosis Following Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer", Volume 6 Issue 10, October 2017, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Pages: 1855-1858, https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=ART20177686, DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/ART20177686