Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Two New Gingival Retraction Systems - An In Vivo Research
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Call for Papers | Fully Refereed | Open Access | Double Blind Peer Reviewed

ISSN: 2319-7064


Downloads: 189 | Views: 501 | Weekly Hits: ⮙1 | Monthly Hits: ⮙1

Research Paper | Dental Science | India | Volume 5 Issue 11, November 2016 | Popularity: 7 / 10


     

Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Two New Gingival Retraction Systems - An In Vivo Research

Dr. Manjeet Dawani, Dr. Seema Sathe, Dr. S. R. Godbole


Abstract: Background Making an impression for fixed prosthesis require the gingival tissue to be displaced to expose the finish lines on the prepared teeth. Therefore, effectively managing the gingiva prior to making an impression is a critical preliminary step in the process of fabricating restorations. Because of enormous variability of clinical cases, it is not possible to use a single method or impression material for fixed prosthesis. Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the amount of lateral displacement by laser and magicfoam retraction systems. Methods and Material Study was conducted on prepared right or left maxillary central incisor for 30 subjects. The pre and post displacement impressions were made with addition silicone material using two stage double mix technique. Final cast were sectioned longitudinally into equal halves. The sectioned halves were assessed under stereomicroscope. The measurements were made from crest of gingival margin to midbuccal surface of the tooth. The amount of gingival displacement in each group was calculated by substracting the pre displacement values from post displacement values. From the observations obtained statistical analysis was performed using independent sample t test. Results Group A showed more amount of lateral displacement than group B. However, amount of gingival displacement between groupA and group B showed statistically significant difference. Conclusion Laser retraction system produced more lateral displacement of gingival compared to magicfoam retraction system.


Keywords: Gingival retraction, lateral displacement, magicfoam, laser, stereomicroscope


Edition: Volume 5 Issue 11, November 2016


Pages: 4 - 10



Make Sure to Disable the Pop-Up Blocker of Web Browser


Text copied to Clipboard!
Dr. Manjeet Dawani, Dr. Seema Sathe, Dr. S. R. Godbole, "Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Two New Gingival Retraction Systems - An In Vivo Research", International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Volume 5 Issue 11, November 2016, pp. 4-10, https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=ART20161411, DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.21275/ART20161411

Similar Articles

Downloads: 47

Review Papers, Dental Science, India, Volume 6 Issue 4, April 2017

Pages: 252 - 254

Advancements in Gingival Retraction Techniques in Restorative Dentistry

Dr. Vivian Flourish D'Costa, Dr. Madhu K Bangera

Share this Article

Downloads: 118

Research Paper, Dental Science, Bulgaria, Volume 7 Issue 3, March 2018

Pages: 1309 - 1312

Comparison of the Time Required for Removal of Bioceramic Sealer and Gutta-Percha with Different Techniques

Elka Radeva, irela arinova-Takorov, Iva Kisjova, Emilia Naseva

Share this Article

Downloads: 126

Research Paper, Dental Science, Iraq, Volume 7 Issue 3, March 2018

Pages: 1815 - 1820

Microleakage Evaluation of Adhesive Systems Reinforced with Fluoroapatite or Calcium Fluoride

Mohammed Kassim Gholam, Mohammed R. Hameed

Share this Article

Downloads: 128

Research Paper, Dental Science, Saudi Arabia, Volume 6 Issue 11, November 2017

Pages: 605 - 610

Appraisal of Staff Perception toward Restored Endodontic Treated Teeth at Selected Dental Clinics, Saudi Arabia

Dr. Reem Abdullah Bunayyan Alkhmsan, Dr. Malak Farraj Alshammari

Share this Article

Downloads: 131

Comparative Studies, Dental Science, Iraq, Volume 8 Issue 1, January 2019

Pages: 919 - 928

Efficacy of XP-endo Finisher, XP-endo Finisher R, CanalBrush and EndoActivator in the removal of Intracanal Medicament (An in Vitro Study)

Teeba Talal Abdul Aziz, Iman M. Al Zaka

Share this Article
Top