Downloads: 189 | Views: 501 | Weekly Hits: ⮙1 | Monthly Hits: ⮙1
Research Paper | Dental Science | India | Volume 5 Issue 11, November 2016 | Popularity: 7 / 10
Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Two New Gingival Retraction Systems - An In Vivo Research
Dr. Manjeet Dawani, Dr. Seema Sathe, Dr. S. R. Godbole
Abstract: Background Making an impression for fixed prosthesis require the gingival tissue to be displaced to expose the finish lines on the prepared teeth. Therefore, effectively managing the gingiva prior to making an impression is a critical preliminary step in the process of fabricating restorations. Because of enormous variability of clinical cases, it is not possible to use a single method or impression material for fixed prosthesis. Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the amount of lateral displacement by laser and magicfoam retraction systems. Methods and Material Study was conducted on prepared right or left maxillary central incisor for 30 subjects. The pre and post displacement impressions were made with addition silicone material using two stage double mix technique. Final cast were sectioned longitudinally into equal halves. The sectioned halves were assessed under stereomicroscope. The measurements were made from crest of gingival margin to midbuccal surface of the tooth. The amount of gingival displacement in each group was calculated by substracting the pre displacement values from post displacement values. From the observations obtained statistical analysis was performed using independent sample t test. Results Group A showed more amount of lateral displacement than group B. However, amount of gingival displacement between groupA and group B showed statistically significant difference. Conclusion Laser retraction system produced more lateral displacement of gingival compared to magicfoam retraction system.
Keywords: Gingival retraction, lateral displacement, magicfoam, laser, stereomicroscope
Edition: Volume 5 Issue 11, November 2016
Pages: 4 - 10
Make Sure to Disable the Pop-Up Blocker of Web Browser
Similar Articles
Downloads: 47
Review Papers, Dental Science, India, Volume 6 Issue 4, April 2017
Pages: 252 - 254Advancements in Gingival Retraction Techniques in Restorative Dentistry
Dr. Vivian Flourish D'Costa, Dr. Madhu K Bangera
Downloads: 118
Research Paper, Dental Science, Bulgaria, Volume 7 Issue 3, March 2018
Pages: 1309 - 1312Comparison of the Time Required for Removal of Bioceramic Sealer and Gutta-Percha with Different Techniques
Elka Radeva, irela arinova-Takorov, Iva Kisjova, Emilia Naseva
Downloads: 126
Research Paper, Dental Science, Iraq, Volume 7 Issue 3, March 2018
Pages: 1815 - 1820Microleakage Evaluation of Adhesive Systems Reinforced with Fluoroapatite or Calcium Fluoride
Mohammed Kassim Gholam, Mohammed R. Hameed
Downloads: 128
Research Paper, Dental Science, Saudi Arabia, Volume 6 Issue 11, November 2017
Pages: 605 - 610Appraisal of Staff Perception toward Restored Endodontic Treated Teeth at Selected Dental Clinics, Saudi Arabia
Dr. Reem Abdullah Bunayyan Alkhmsan, Dr. Malak Farraj Alshammari
Downloads: 131
Comparative Studies, Dental Science, Iraq, Volume 8 Issue 1, January 2019
Pages: 919 - 928Efficacy of XP-endo Finisher, XP-endo Finisher R, CanalBrush and EndoActivator in the removal of Intracanal Medicament (An in Vitro Study)
Teeba Talal Abdul Aziz, Iman M. Al Zaka