Rate the Article: Relationship and Responsiveness of Three Outcome Measures of Upper Limb Motor Function after Stroke Rehabilitation, IJSR, Call for Papers, Online Journal
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Call for Papers | Fully Refereed | Open Access | Double Blind Peer Reviewed

ISSN: 2319-7064

Downloads: 138 | Views: 336 | Weekly Hits: ⮙1 | Monthly Hits: ⮙1

Research Paper | Physiotherapy | India | Volume 8 Issue 6, June 2019 | Rating: 6.9 / 10


Relationship and Responsiveness of Three Outcome Measures of Upper Limb Motor Function after Stroke Rehabilitation

Ershad Ansari, Chaitali Shah


Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To find the assessment tool which can be incorporated as a part of regular assessment by which therapist can plan their treatment protocol effectively as well as measure the recovery of intervention. SUBJECTS and METHODS: 45 subjects diagnosed with stroke onset at least 6 months previously were assigned to study. Intervention in form of Conventional, bilateral arm training and task specific training were given for 3 weeks. Upper extremity function tests were evaluated by Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) pre-and post-treatment. Relationship and responsiveness of all clinical test were performed by Spearman’s correlation coefficient and Paired-t test respectively. RESULT: All correlations were significant at 95 % C. I. at baseline as well as three-week time. The highest correlation was found between CAHAI and WMFT which was 0.637. Responsiveness of all three outcomes was significant at 95 % C. I. The responsiveness of CAHAI was significantly higher of mean difference 10.533 at 95 % C. I (10.06 to10.99) compared to WMFT and ARAT. CONCLUSION: CAHAI can be included in regular part of assessment which is having good clinimetric properties and assesses bilateral arm activities and actual performance of patient.


Keywords: stroke, upper extremity, outcome measure, rehabilitation


Edition: Volume 8 Issue 6, June 2019,


Pages: 958 - 963



Rate this Article


Select Rating (Lowest: 1, Highest: 10)

5

Your Comments (Only high quality comments will be accepted.)

Characters: 0

Your Full Name:


Your Valid Email Address:


Verification Code will appear in 2 Seconds ... Wait

Top