Silicone, Thermoplastic Elastomer, and Polyurethane Prosthetic Liners: Material-Dependent Biomechanics, Clinical Decision-Making, and Research Priorities - A Critical Narrative Review
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Call for Papers | Fully Refereed | Open Access | Double Blind Peer Reviewed

ISSN: 2319-7064

Silicone, Thermoplastic Elastomer, and Polyurethane Prosthetic Liners: Material-Dependent Biomechanics, Clinical Decision-Making, and Research Priorities - A Critical Narrative Review

Sanket Kumar Rout, Sonali Mishra

Abstract: Background: Prosthetic liners couple soft residual-limb tissues to a comparatively rigid socket. Their mechanical response may modify loading and suspension, while limited heat and vapor transfer can complicate prolonged wear. Material-family labels are often used in prescription despite marked product-to-product variation. Objective: To examine what published comparisons actually establish about silicone, thermoplastic elastomer (TPE), and polyurethane (PU) liners, and to distinguish measurable material differences from unproven clinical assumptions. Methods: This critical narrative review integrates selected peer-reviewed investigations of liner compression, shear, tension, friction, and thermal conductivity. Evidence is organized by test domain and clinical relevance. Because no exhaustive database screening or formal risk-of-bias procedure was completed, the synthesis is not described as systematic. Findings: In one commercial-product comparison, mean compressive tangent moduli were 310 ± 100 kPa for silicone, 140 ± 30 kPa for TPE, and 300 ± 40 kPa for PU; corresponding shear values were 69 ± 17, 21 ± 5, and 63 ± 3 kPa. Reinforcement strongly affected tensile response, and tested PU products had comparatively low friction. These results describe particular products and protocols, not intrinsic polymer constants or demonstrated patient-outcome advantages. Conclusion: A polymer-only ranking cannot guide reliable prescription. Clinical selection requires consideration of construction, socket fit, suspension, tissue condition, activity, moisture, and patient-reported experience. Comparative patient-level studies remain necessary.

Keywords: Prosthetic liners; socket-interface biomechanics; silicone; thermoplastic elastomers; polyurethane

How to Cite?: Sanket Kumar Rout, Sonali Mishra, "Silicone, Thermoplastic Elastomer, and Polyurethane Prosthetic Liners: Material-Dependent Biomechanics, Clinical Decision-Making, and Research Priorities - A Critical Narrative Review", Volume 15 Issue 11, November 2026, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Pages: 445-449, https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SR261111175803, DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/SR261111175803

Download Citation: APA | MLA | BibTeX | EndNote | RefMan

Share This Research

Help this article reach readers, researchers and professionals.

Share activity is measured for research-engagement analytics. Only verified, unique public shares can support award tie-breaking.

Confirm Your Share

Enter your details so IJSR can confirm this sharing activity.

Your details are used to validate this share and protect the award process from duplicate or false activity.

Download Article PDF


Rate This Article!

Top

Confirm Your Share

Enter your details so IJSR can confirm this sharing activity.

Your details are used to validate this share and protect the award process from duplicate or false activity.