Comparison of Microscopy and ELISA for the Detection of Entamoeba histolytica in Stool Samples of Pediatric Patients with Acute Gastroenteritis
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Call for Papers | Fully Refereed | Open Access | Double Blind Peer Reviewed

ISSN: 2319-7064

Comparison of Microscopy and ELISA for the Detection of Entamoeba histolytica in Stool Samples of Pediatric Patients with Acute Gastroenteritis

Shagun Tyagi, Akanksha Sharma, Manisha Khandait, Mukesh Sharma, Rashmi Phogat

Abstract: Background: Amoebiasis caused by Entamoeba histolytica remains an important intestinal parasitic infection, particularly in developing countries. Conventional stool microscopy is inexpensive and widely available but has limitations in sensitivity and species-specific identification. Antigen-detection enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) provides an alternative diagnostic approach. Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of conventional stool microscopy and ELISA for the detection of E. histolytica in stool samples obtained from pediatric patients presenting with acute gastroenteritis. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over a period of six months in the Department of Microbiology, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India. A total of 79 stool samples from patients aged 1-18 years presenting with symptoms of acute gastroenteritis were examined. Direct wet-mount microscopy using normal saline and iodine preparations was performed for detection of Entamoeba cysts and trophozoites. All samples were additionally tested using the Serazym? Entamoeba histolytica ELISA, which detects the serine-rich E. histolytica protein (SREHP). Microscopy was used as the reference standard for calculation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: Microscopy detected 2 positive samples (2.53%), whereas ELISA detected 3 positive samples (3.79%). Compared with microscopy, ELISA demonstrated a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 98.7%, PPV of 66.7%, and NPV of 100%. One sample was positive by ELISA but negative by microscopy. Conclusion: In this study, ELISA demonstrated high diagnostic performance compared with conventional microscopy for the detection of E. histolytica. The additional ELISA-positive result highlights the potential value of antigen detection in samples that may not be identified by microscopy. However, the small number of positive cases and use of microscopy as the reference standard limit the precision and interpretation of the diagnostic accuracy estimates. Larger studies using an independent reference method are warranted.

Keywords: Entamoeba histolytica; amoebiasis; microscopy; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; ELISA; SREHP; stool examination; diagnostic accuracy; acute gastroenteritis

How to Cite?: Shagun Tyagi, Akanksha Sharma, Manisha Khandait, Mukesh Sharma, Rashmi Phogat, "Comparison of Microscopy and ELISA for the Detection of Entamoeba histolytica in Stool Samples of Pediatric Patients with Acute Gastroenteritis", Volume 15 Issue 11, November 2026, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Pages: 254-258, https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SR261104122809, DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/SR261104122809

Download Citation: APA | MLA | BibTeX | EndNote | RefMan

Share This Research

Help this article reach readers, researchers and professionals.

Share activity is measured for research-engagement analytics. Only verified, unique public shares can support award tie-breaking.

Confirm Your Share

Enter your details so IJSR can confirm this sharing activity.

Your details are used to validate this share and protect the award process from duplicate or false activity.

Download Article PDF


Rate This Article!

Top

Confirm Your Share

Enter your details so IJSR can confirm this sharing activity.

Your details are used to validate this share and protect the award process from duplicate or false activity.