Comparative Observational Study of General versus Regional Anesthesia in Placenta Previa Cases

Dr. Shubham Nagpal

Abstract: Objective: To compare maternal and fetal outcomes in placenta previa cases managed with general anesthesia (GA) versus regional anesthesia (RA) during cesarean delivery. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted involving 60 patients with diagnosed placenta previa undergoing cesarean section. Thirty patients received GA and 30 received RA. Data were collected on intraoperative blood loss, hemodynamic stability, neonatal outcomes, and maternal complications. Results: Patients under RA had significantly lower mean blood loss (580 ? 120 ml) compared to GA group (820 ? 150 ml). Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes were significantly better in the RA group. Incidence of ICU admission and postoperative nausea were higher in the GA group. Conclusion: Regional anesthesia offers better maternal and neonatal outcomes in placenta previa cases compared to general anesthesia. Whenever feasible, RA should be preferred.

Keywords: Placenta previa, General anesthesia, regional anesthesia, Cesarean section, Maternal outcomes, Neonatal Apgar score

How to Cite?: Dr. Shubham Nagpal, "Comparative Observational Study of General versus Regional Anesthesia in Placenta Previa Cases", Volume 14 Issue 8, August 2025, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Pages: 118-119, https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SR25802170532, DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/SR25802170532