International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Since Year 2012 | Open Access | Fully Refereed | Peer Reviewed

ISSN: 2319-7064




Downloads: 99

Research Paper | Medical Science | Sudan | Volume 9 Issue 3, March 2020


Optimizing Detection of Prostate Cancer by AMACR and P63 on Prostatic Needle Biopsy- Sudanese Experience

Ahmed Ibn Edriss Mohamed | El Jaily Mohamed | Abbashar Mohamed | Mohamed El Imam


Abstract: Establishing a definitive diagnosis is the major challenge in prostatic needle biopsyespecially in small focus of cancer as there is no single specific histologic feature for malignancy or due to the presence of benign mimickers. However, the lack of specific marker for prostate cancer, which can be utilized with routine H & E to enhance diagnostic precision remains a limitation. Recently, basal cell marker P63 and prostate cancer marker AMACR have been used as adjuvant to morphology for diagnosis of such challenging foci. This study was set out to determine the sensitivity and specificity of these markers and their usefulness in differentiation between prostate adenocarcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) on prostatic needle biopsy. Method: A 250 archival prostate needle biopsies during 2017–2019 were selected and sorted according to routine H & E as follow; 100 prostatic adenocarcinoma, 50 Atypical (ATYP) and 100 of BPH. Sections of 5 µm thickness were cut, then Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using monoclonal AMACR and P63 antibodies and the results were analyzed using SPSS. Results: AMACR had 95 % sensitivity and 98 % specificity, statistically AMACR wassignificantly expressed in prostate adenocarcinoma P. value (0.000). P63 had 95 % sensitivity and 95 % specificity, it was significantly expressed in benign prostatic hyperplasia P. value (0.000). By IHC 38/50 atypical foci (ATYP), was confirmed as adenocarcinoma while 12/50 case reported as BPH. The study concluded that combination of AMACR as a positive marker and p63 as a negative marker will improve sensitivity, specificity and enhances diagnostic precision.


Keywords: Prostate cancer, TRUS biopsy Sudan AMACR P63


Edition: Volume 9 Issue 3, March 2020,


Pages: 1580 - 1583

Optimizing Detection of Prostate Cancer by AMACR and P63 on Prostatic Needle Biopsy- Sudanese Experience


How to Cite this Article?

Ahmed Ibn Edriss Mohamed, El Jaily Mohamed, Abbashar Mohamed, Mohamed El Imam, "Optimizing Detection of Prostate Cancer by AMACR and P63 on Prostatic Needle Biopsy- Sudanese Experience", International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), https://www.ijsr.net/get_abstract.php?paper_id=SR20328172448, Volume 9 Issue 3, March 2020, 1580 - 1583, #ijsrnet

How to Share this Article?

Enter Your Email Address




Similar Articles with Keyword 'Prostate'

Downloads: 34

Research Paper, Medical Science, India, Volume 10 Issue 1, January 2021

Pages: 1469 - 1470

Prospective Study of Metastatic Lung Cancer Patients

Arvind Kumar [12] | Indranil Ghosh

Share this Article

Downloads: 105

Research Paper, Medical Science, Turkey, Volume 8 Issue 12, December 2019

Pages: 1676 - 1679

Bothersomeness About Side Effects due to Medical Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

M. Ahmet Tunckiran

Share this Article


Top