%PDF-1.5
%
53 0 obj
null
endobj
29 0 obj
<<
/Ascent 1006
/CapHeight 716
/Descent -325
/Flags 32
/FontBBox [ -665 -325 2000 1006 ]
/FontFamily (Arial)
/FontName /Arial
/FontStretch /Normal
/FontWeight 400
/ItalicAngle 0
/StemV 88
/Type /FontDescriptor
/XHeight 519
>>
endobj
32 0 obj
<<
/Ascent 891
/CIDSet 30 0 R
/CapHeight 1000
/Descent -216
/Flags 70
/FontBBox [ -498 -307 1333 1023 ]
/FontFamily (Times New Roman)
/FontFile2 31 0 R
/FontName /PAKPMG+TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT
/FontStretch /Normal
/FontWeight 400
/ItalicAngle -15
/StemV 71.742
/Type /FontDescriptor
/XHeight 1000
>>
endobj
35 0 obj
[ /Indexed 7 0 R 255 37 0 R ]
endobj
40 0 obj
<<
/Count 3
/Kids [ 38 0 R 42 0 R 43 0 R ]
/Parent 20 0 R
/Type /Pages
>>
endobj
24 0 obj
<<
/BaseFont /PAKPMG+TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT
/CIDSystemInfo <<
/Ordering (Identity)
/Registry (Adobe)
/Supplement 0
>>
/CIDToGIDMap /Identity
/DW 1000
/FontDescriptor 32 0 R
/Subtype /CIDFontType2
/Type /Font
/W [ 237 [ 675 ] ]
>>
endobj
21 0 obj
[ /ICCBased 78 0 R ]
endobj
26 0 obj
<<
/Ascent 1026
/CapHeight 662
/Descent -307
/Flags 34
/FontBBox [ -558 -307 2000 1026 ]
/FontFamily (Times New Roman)
/FontFile2 74 0 R
/FontName /HPLANK+TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT
/FontStretch /Normal
/FontWeight 700
/ItalicAngle 0
/StemV 136
/Type /FontDescriptor
/XHeight 457
>>
endobj
28 0 obj
<<
/Ascent 891
/CapHeight 1000
/Descent -216
/Flags 98
/FontBBox [ -498 -307 1333 1023 ]
/FontFamily (Times New Roman)
/FontName /TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT
/FontStretch /Normal
/FontWeight 400
/ItalicAngle -15
/StemV 71.742
/Type /FontDescriptor
/XHeight 1000
>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<<
/Ascent 1007
/CapHeight 662
/Descent -307
/Flags 34
/FontBBox [ -568 -307 2000 1007 ]
/FontFamily (Times New Roman)
/FontFile2 75 0 R
/FontName /ZDKEFA+TimesNewRomanPSMT
/FontStretch /Normal
/FontWeight 400
/ItalicAngle 0
/StemV 80
/Type /FontDescriptor
/XHeight 448
>>
endobj
44 0 obj
[ /ICCBased 23 0 R ]
endobj
50 0 obj
[ ]
endobj
66 0 obj
<<
/DA (/Helv 0 Tf 0 g )
/DR <<
/Encoding <<
/PDFDocEncoding 52 0 R
>>
/Font <<
/Helv 51 0 R
>>
>>
/Fields 50 0 R
>>
endobj
69 0 obj
<<
/BaseFont /PAKPHC+Calibri
/CIDSystemInfo <<
/Ordering (Identity)
/Registry (Adobe)
/Supplement 0
>>
/CIDToGIDMap /Identity
/DW 1000
/FontDescriptor 73 0 R
/Subtype /CIDFontType2
/Type /Font
/W [ 3 [ 226 ] ]
>>
endobj
71 0 obj
<<
/Ascent 750
/CapHeight 1000
/Descent -250
/Flags 32
/FontBBox [ -503 -307 1240 964 ]
/FontFamily (Calibri)
/FontFile2 76 0 R
/FontName /PAKPIC+Calibri
/FontStretch /Normal
/FontWeight 400
/ItalicAngle 0
/StemV 80
/Type /FontDescriptor
/XHeight 1000
>>
endobj
72 0 obj
<<
/Ascent 1032
/CapHeight 662
/Descent -307
/Flags 98
/FontBBox [ -547 -307 1401 1032 ]
/FontFamily (Times New Roman)
/FontFile2 77 0 R
/FontName /OKAQHW+TimesNewRomanPS-BoldItalicMT
/FontStretch /Normal
/FontWeight 700
/ItalicAngle -17
/StemV 124
/Type /FontDescriptor
/XHeight 453
>>
endobj
52 0 obj
<<
/Differences [ 24 /breve /caron /circumflex /dotaccent /hungarumlaut /ogonek /ring /tilde 39 /quotesingle
96 /grave 128 /bullet /dagger /daggerdbl /ellipsis /emdash /endash /florin /fraction
/guilsinglleft /guilsinglright /minus /perthousand /quotedblbase /quotedblleft /quotedblright
/quoteleft /quoteright /quotesinglbase /trademark /fi /fl /Lslash /OE /Scaron /Ydieresis
/Zcaron /dotlessi /lslash /oe /scaron /zcaron 160 /Euro 164 /currency 166 /brokenbar
168 /dieresis /copyright /ordfeminine 172 /logicalnot /.notdef /registered /macron
/degree /plusminus /twosuperior /threesuperior /acute /mu 183 /periodcentered /cedilla
/onesuperior /ordmasculine 188 /onequarter /onehalf /threequarters 192 /Agrave /Aacute
/Acircumflex /Atilde /Adieresis /Aring /AE /Ccedilla /Egrave /Eacute /Ecircumflex
/Edieresis /Igrave /Iacute /Icircumflex /Idieresis /Eth /Ntilde /Ograve /Oacute /Ocircumflex
/Otilde /Odieresis /multiply /Oslash /Ugrave /Uacute /Ucircumflex /Udieresis /Yacute
/Thorn /germandbls /agrave /aacute /acircumflex /atilde /adieresis /aring /ae /ccedilla
/egrave /eacute /ecircumflex /edieresis /igrave /iacute /icircumflex /idieresis /eth
/ntilde /ograve /oacute /ocircumflex /otilde /odieresis /divide /oslash /ugrave /uacute
/ucircumflex /udieresis /yacute /thorn /ydieresis ]
/Type /Encoding
>>
endobj
51 0 obj
<<
/BaseFont /Helvetica
/Encoding 52 0 R
/Name /Helv
/Subtype /Type1
/Type /Font
>>
endobj
62 0 obj
<<
/BaseFont /PAKPHC+Calibri
/DescendantFonts [ 69 0 R ]
/Encoding /Identity-H
/Subtype /Type0
/ToUnicode 70 0 R
/Type /Font
>>
endobj
64 0 obj
<<
/BaseFont /OKAQHW+TimesNewRomanPS-BoldItalicMT
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/FirstChar 32
/FontDescriptor 72 0 R
/LastChar 146
/Subtype /TrueType
/Type /Font
/Widths [ 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 333 0 0 250 333 250 0 500 500 500 0 500 0 0 500 500 500 333
0 0 0 0 0 0 667 667 0 722 667 667 722 778 389 0 667 0 889 722 0 0 0 667 556 611 0
0 889 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 500 444 500 444 333 500 556 278 278 500 278 778 556 500
500 500 389 389 278 556 444 667 500 444 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 333 ]
>>
endobj
63 0 obj
<<
/BaseFont /PAKPIC+Calibri
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/FirstChar 58
/FontDescriptor 71 0 R
/LastChar 58
/Subtype /TrueType
/Type /Font
/Widths [ 268 ]
>>
endobj
11 0 obj
<<
/BaseFont /PAKPMG+TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT
/DescendantFonts [ 24 0 R ]
/Encoding /Identity-H
/Subtype /Type0
/ToUnicode 25 0 R
/Type /Font
>>
endobj
10 0 obj
<<
/AIS false
/BM /Normal
/CA 1
/OP false
/OPM 0
/SA true
/SMask /None
/Type /ExtGState
/ca 1
/op false
>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<<
/BaseFont /HPLANK+TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/FirstChar 32
/FontDescriptor 26 0 R
/LastChar 147
/Subtype /TrueType
/Type /Font
/Widths [ 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 333 0 0 250 333 250 0 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
500 333 0 0 0 0 0 0 722 667 722 722 667 611 0 778 389 500 778 667 944 722 778 611
0 722 556 667 0 722 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 556 444 556 444 333 500 556 278 333 0
278 833 556 500 556 0 444 389 333 556 500 722 0 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 ]
>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<<
/BaseFont /TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/FirstChar 32
/FontDescriptor 28 0 R
/LastChar 121
/Subtype /TrueType
/Type /Font
/Widths [ 250 0 0 0 0 0 778 0 333 333 0 0 250 333 250 278 0 500 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 0 0
0 0 0 0 611 611 667 722 611 611 0 0 333 444 667 0 833 667 0 611 0 611 500 556 0 0
0 0 0 556 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 0 444 500 444 278 500 500 278 0 444 278 722 500 500 500
0 389 389 278 500 444 667 444 444 ]
>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<<
/BaseFont /ZDKEFA+TimesNewRomanPSMT
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/FirstChar 32
/FontDescriptor 27 0 R
/LastChar 150
/Subtype /TrueType
/Type /Font
/Widths [ 250 0 408 500 0 833 0 0 333 333 500 564 250 333 250 278 500 500 500 500 500 500
500 500 500 500 278 278 564 564 564 444 0 722 667 667 722 611 556 722 722 333 389
722 611 889 722 722 556 0 667 556 611 722 722 944 0 722 611 333 0 333 0 500 0 444
500 444 500 444 333 500 500 278 278 500 278 778 500 500 500 500 333 389 278 500 500
722 500 500 444 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 333 444 444 0 500
]
>>
endobj
9 0 obj
<<
/AIS false
/BM /Normal
/CA 1
/OP false
/OPM 1
/SA false
/SMask /None
/Type /ExtGState
/ca 1
/op false
>>
endobj
5 0 obj
<<
/Count 4
/Kids [ 17 0 R 3 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R ]
/Parent 20 0 R
/Type /Pages
>>
endobj
1 0 obj
<<
/Author (Md. Abdus Salam)
/CreationDate (D:20131223223727+05'30')
/Creator (International Journal of Science and Research \(IJSR\), www.ijsr.net)
/Keywords (Efficient market, Random walk model, Autocorrelation, Run test, Dhaka stock exchange\r\n)
/ModDate (D:20200331135027+05'30')
/Producer (Total PDF Watermark Remover 1.0.214)
/Subject (The purpose of this study is to test The Weak Form Efficient Market Hypothesis in Dhakas Stock Market. The study examined the distribution of equity returns by dividing the sample period into two sub periods of daily DSE General Index \(DGEN\) and sub periods are sample-1\(2004-2007\), and sample-2 \(2008-2012\). Also, monthly general index starting from 1990 to 2012 are taken as sample to test the Random walk model \(RWM\) and market efficiency. The sample included total 1099 daily observations for sample-1, 1189 for sample-2 and 20 for each month return. Return distributions are studied by comparing the descriptive statistics of the Dhaka Stock Exchange Index \(DGEN\). The five conventional ways: Descriptive statistics, Kolmogrov Smirnov goodness of fit test \(K-S test\) autocorrelation, run test and Technical trading rules are used to prove the evidences of weak form market efficiency. The result shows only the tests of weak-form efficiency. By applying Descriptive statistics, Kolmogrov Smirnov goodness of fit test \(K-S test\) autocorrelation and Technical trading rules tests provides that daily return of Dhaka stock market is not weak form efficient and strongly rejects the null hypothesis. The run test of monthly return of Dhaka Stock market accepts the Null hypothesis significantly and shows efficient at weak form.\r\n)
/Title (Testing on Weak Form Market Efficiency Hypothesis: The Evidence from Dhaka Stock Market Year 2004-2012)
>>
endobj
6 0 obj
[ /Indexed 21 0 R 76 22 0 R ]
endobj
8 0 obj
<<
/AIS false
/BM /Normal
/CA 1
/OP false
/OPM 1
/SA true
/SMask /None
/Type /ExtGState
/ca 1
/op false
>>
endobj
7 0 obj
[ /ICCBased 23 0 R ]
endobj
15 0 obj
<<
/BaseFont /Arial
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/FirstChar 0
/FontDescriptor 29 0 R
/LastChar 255
/Subtype /TrueType
/Type /Font
/Widths [ 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750
750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 278 278 355 556 556 889 667 191 333
333 389 584 278 333 278 278 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 278 278 584 584
584 556 1015 667 667 722 722 667 611 778 722 278 500 667 556 833 722 778 667 778
722 667 611 722 667 944 667 667 611 278 278 278 469 556 333 556 556 500 556 556 278
556 556 222 222 500 222 833 556 556 556 556 333 500 278 556 500 722 500 500 500 334
260 334 584 350 556 350 222 556 333 1000 556 556 333 1000 667 333 1000 350 611 350
350 222 222 333 333 350 556 1000 333 1000 500 333 944 350 500 667 278 333 556 556
556 556 260 556 333 737 370 556 584 333 737 552 400 549 333 333 333 576 537 333 333
333 365 556 834 834 834 611 667 667 667 667 667 667 1000 722 667 667 667 667 278
278 278 278 722 722 778 778 778 778 778 584 778 722 722 722 722 667 667 611 556 556
556 556 556 556 889 500 556 556 556 556 278 278 278 278 556 556 556 556 556 556 556
549 611 556 556 556 556 500 556 500 ]
>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<<
/Count 7
/Kids [ 5 0 R 40 0 R ]
/Type /Pages
>>
endobj
73 0 obj
<<
/Ascent 750
/CIDSet 79 0 R
/CapHeight 1000
/Descent -250
/Flags 4
/FontBBox [ -503 -307 1240 964 ]
/FontFamily (Calibri)
/FontFile2 80 0 R
/FontName /PAKPHC+Calibri
/FontStretch /Normal
/FontWeight 400
/ItalicAngle 0
/StemV 80
/Type /FontDescriptor
/XHeight 1000
>>
endobj
2 0 obj
<<
/Length 6226
/Type /Metadata
/Subtype /XML
>>
stream
Md. Abdus Salam
Efficient market
Random walk model
Autocorrelation
Run test
Dhaka stock exchange
The purpose of this study is to test The Weak Form Efficient Market Hypothesis in Dhaka’s Stock Market. The study examined the distribution of equity returns by dividing the sample period into two sub periods of daily DSE General Index (DGEN) and sub periods are sample-1(2004-2007), and sample-2 (2008-2012). Also, monthly general index starting from 1990 to 2012 are taken as sample to test the Random walk model (RWM) and market efficiency. The sample included total 1099 daily observations for sample-1, 1189 for sample-2 and 20 for each month return. Return distributions are studied by comparing the descriptive statistics of the Dhaka Stock Exchange Index (DGEN). The five conventional ways: Descriptive statistics, Kolmogrov Smirnov goodness of fit test (K-S test) autocorrelation, run test and Technical trading rules are used to prove the evidences of weak form market efficiency. The result shows only the tests of weak-form efficiency. By applying Descriptive statistics, Kolmogrov Smirnov goodness of fit test (K-S test) autocorrelation and Technical trading rules tests provides that daily return of Dhaka stock market is not weak form efficient and strongly rejects the null hypothesis. The run test of monthly return of Dhaka Stock market accepts the Null hypothesis significantly and shows efficient at weak form.
Testing on Weak Form Market Efficiency Hypothesis: The Evidence from Dhaka Stock Market Year 2004-2012
Total PDF Watermark Remover 1.0.214
2020-03-31T13:50:27+05:30
http://www.foxitsoftware.com/connectedPDF/1.0/
cPDF
ConnectedPDF Schema
cDocID
Text
external
The cDocID
cVersionID
Text
external
The cVersionID
cReviewID
Text
external
The cReviewID
https://cws.connectedpdf.com/cDocID/87B93A9926C127C84CACD7C9E709CE43~6E176882C02111E8AED3FDF91D3C9DB260D4121E2CC169CC-FEBEA3201A81CCA0-07B9944D0E3B5B3477588600
https://cws.connectedpdf.com/cVersionID/87B93A9926C127C84CACD7C9E709CE43~6E176883C02111E8AED3FDF91D3C9DB260D4121E2CC169CC-EE1D27A9A6AD1176-9CEC0C2101A3E5044B5F8600
endstream
endobj
3 0 obj
<<
/Contents 4 0 R
/CropBox [ 0 0 595.22 842 ]
/MediaBox [ 0 0 595.22 842 ]
/Parent 85 0 R
/Resources <<
/ColorSpace <<
/CS0 6 0 R
/CS1 7 0 R
>>
/ExtGState <<
/GS0 8 0 R
/GS1 9 0 R
/GS2 10 0 R
>>
/Font <<
/C2_0 11 0 R
/TT0 12 0 R
/TT1 13 0 R
/TT2 14 0 R
/TT3 15 0 R
>>
/ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageC /ImageI ]
/XObject <<
/Im0 16 0 R
>>
>>
/Rotate 0
/Type /Page
>>
endobj
4 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 7131
>>
stream
HWr~S&yˎ]Kn2R #Ԑ=گ@s,9eFїs) (ˠPiYYbAkZNi;P*KK2PQѨBJb$qiB})le3_<37jecNN灞W"ٵ(^I2sD$_9isbtۧ'LvH( :nዡmCqz" .T8
AZEy.eG^ܙ2;ITiiL@f@XO9JNZ: |;ͷg]M$<gx+fӀb`L)Y_xϭ+Um
O.Ǯ_yTEraw?jw<9Vxp%v_V8@]z>x1bseO)Gt
FQ盛+]O|LZC7"v8ôM8Ϊ[nqMDsR,yBle`_'P9"%v vU5;ʯ6vGE,neiyeE'%#ҦBL3
yﴍ%sQE]}d||lνc//
͂ރGo/tAkܵiYzl/zӽ@:Mjc8:"#c ~'BWe@?4rD/:Ob%XaA<W.!ӷ>rZ3KSfqߒG7yx8_Dara<
dqnRZ/nj6w¨25[6}y4v\\ɚvjd,;m1Q-Kn?1H%.Tע@0*4wȬ̒kdFjĚ֭POy/_ O81!AF?3}sxO=Vh"qU[o,^JִfKgDt_]5FJ12NHm訄&{(yXbGa#HϢp[uiΉ \hWfOhk,[@Gq,c o~H@ҕt n麇WQtxw;ұ梙eTUa[\nm]9ԏ/z]UXJx$Oo/6rE
?҅%)>MXd
C\HIv;Ç(i?آFpιqH t.Ffn#ouWOɢ=@nT4ԛE&OHS
C]ȵ},jz&A2VpXC!Jᔶ_0FPx8f(iPcgvf:Awۜ5rsqs!nqce%ޝH O~TM5
Wa#ެ(嘿f/sS!K{R2╃n6^.*Or$vG?eRόZuhןdz'῏rM&_qYФ:aJ{ 0Hӹ
PUbMvLR=\zMEp
\H7LV}vNG6(A;Ł{+bZg
'W؛V^DMWu:>eT/[vGF1>_:o-w7N.?s.?jYo|2pXE9:3abSOŧdnoz|7lJ'4LmvO}gCߖQV'X@akf%Mn6Cwl!I(9y=0!7 1&}tƯgd
W8n|vBXc}rSتv0_-W
;r#&n3mWRsV}:H,H )Z|Rr~&
IEOh?|3iTږ\9a6ԩ';ZR6WM1S):нsR